Addition of descriptor to sign does not prevent likelihood of confusion

  • News

February 1, 2020

Picture Carja Mastenbroek

Carja Mastenbroek

Illustration of a man standing in a complex web of lines

The preliminary relief judge ruled that the use of the sign (SIR) FRANKLIN in the catering industry infringes the FRANKLIN trade mark, despite the user’s defence that there was no trade mark use. A brief analysis.

Recently, the preliminary relief judge ruled that the sign (SIR) FRANKLIN infringes the Benelux trade mark FRANKLIN. The sign and trade mark were both used for catering establishments. 

The user of the sign (SIR) FRANKLIN argued that it was not using the sign as a trade mark and that the sign SIR FRANKLIN was not confusingly similar to the mark FRANKLIN. 

Infringement injunction granted

The interlocutory court does not go along with this and grants an injunction against infringement. Read the main consideration of the ruling below. 

Trademark use occurs when a sign is used in such a way as to create a link between the sign identifying an undertaking and the goods being put on the market or services being provided.

Pursuant to Article 2.20(2)(b) BTIP, a trade mark proprietor may prohibit a third party who has not obtained his consent from using, in the course of trade, a sign which is identical with or similar to the trade mark in relation to the same or similar goods or services for which the trade mark is registered, if this is likely to cause confusion among the relevant public.

All relevant circumstances

The likelihood of confusion should be assessed globally according to the impression the signs make on the average consumer of the goods or services concerned, taking into account all relevant circumstances of the case.

In the case of catering businesses, one such circumstance is that online reviews are important, as the catering public often chooses an eatery based on such reviews. 

If a third party uses a sign similar to a trademark on TripAdvisor, there is a likelihood of confusion. This is all the more true since it is not unusual for catering establishments to be part of a chain and operate in several locations at the same time.

Descriptors for hospitality industry

The addition of ‘Boutique hotel’, ‘Brasserie’ and ‘Cocktail bar’ are descriptive elements for a catering establishment and does not take the public’s attention away from the distinctive element of a sign and therefore does not make it non-infringing.

Recent insights

Design rights vs. trademark rights and copyright: how do you protect the design of your product?

Protecting a unique shape through trademark law is often challenging due to strict requirements regarding distinctive character. Design rights offer a more accessible alternative to secure your designs quickly and effectively. Read how design rights function as a supplement to copyright and discover the registration options within the EU and the Benelux.

Insight

Strict limits to trademark law: the Rubik’s Cube ruling

Can the shape of the Rubik’s Cube be a trademark? On July 9, 2025, the General Court of the EU ruled that technical features, such as the rotating blocks, cannot be protected as a trademark. Read why this ruling is crucial for the boundary between technology and trademark law.

Insight

Freeriders in trouble: just compensation for Dassault

The North Holland District Court awarded Dassault Systèmes damages based on lost licence revenue. Hooks Creative and Soopl used SolidWorks without a licence and thus infringed copyright.

Insight

Deel dit artikel

White sneakers with yellow pants on tiled floor

Would you like to make an appointment?

For an appointment with one of our lawyers, for advice or orientation, we would be happy to welcome you to our office in Ouderkerk aan de Amstel or we will come to you.

  • Top players in the market
  • Always high quality
  • Expert and discreet

No spam, ever.