Flitsmeister PRO: committee rules on misleading advertising

  • News

September 24, 2019

Good Law Logo image

Editorial

Illustrated surveillance camera in snowy landscape.

In the third quarter of this year, the Advertising Standards Commission received 759 complaints and notifications. One of these complaints was against Flitsmeister and their PRO service.

In the third quarter of this year, the Advertising Standards Commission received 759 complaints and notifications. One of these complaints was against Flitsmeister and their PRO service. The complaint revolved around a promise of an ad-free experience that was not delivered.

No ads, still advertising

Flitsmeister PRO was offered with the promise: ‘Don’t see ads? Create an account first and then buy PRO for €8.99 a year.’ However, one user complained that despite this purchase, she received a message about a ‘soundpack’, an extra feature that allows files to be read out by a BN.

The Advertising Standards Commission considered this message to be advertising. According to the Commission, the promise of an ad-free experience was not fulfilled, misleading users about the key features of the product.

Verdict: misleading and unfair

The Commission ruled that the communication surrounding Flitsmeister PRO was misleading and thus in violation of the Dutch Advertising Code. The failure to fulfil the promise resulted in an unfair expression. Flitsmeister was therefore recommended to stop advertising in this way.

Recent insights

Design rights vs. trademark rights and copyright: how do you protect the design of your product?

Protecting a unique shape through trademark law is often challenging due to strict requirements regarding distinctive character. Design rights offer a more accessible alternative to secure your designs quickly and effectively. Read how design rights function as a supplement to copyright and discover the registration options within the EU and the Benelux.

Insight

Strict limits to trademark law: the Rubik’s Cube ruling

Can the shape of the Rubik’s Cube be a trademark? On July 9, 2025, the General Court of the EU ruled that technical features, such as the rotating blocks, cannot be protected as a trademark. Read why this ruling is crucial for the boundary between technology and trademark law.

Insight

Freeriders in trouble: just compensation for Dassault

The North Holland District Court awarded Dassault Systèmes damages based on lost licence revenue. Hooks Creative and Soopl used SolidWorks without a licence and thus infringed copyright.

Insight

Deel dit artikel

White sneakers with yellow pants on tiled floor

Would you like to make an appointment?

For an appointment with one of our lawyers, for advice or orientation, we would be happy to welcome you to our office in Ouderkerk aan de Amstel or we will come to you.

  • Top players in the market
  • Always high quality
  • Expert and discreet

No spam, ever.