From seducing to misleading: protecting online consumers

  • Insight

December 1, 2019

Good Law Logo image

Editorial

Cybersecurity network with shield and computers

The ACM has published guidance to help companies treat online consumers fairly and transparently. Where are the boundaries between enticing and misleading? 

The Consumer & Market Authority (ACM) has published the Guideline for Online Consumer Protection, in which it defines when online seduction turns into deception. The guidance provides a practical framework for businesses and serves as a basis for enforcement by the ACM.

Clear guidelines for companies

The ACM stresses the importance of fair online practices. Companies should ensure that consumers receive clear, complete and understandable information, and that this information is easy to find before consumers make a purchase.

In addition, the design of the online environment should be logical and fair, with default settings that are beneficial to consumers. Vulnerable consumers deserve extra attention, and companies are encouraged to test the effects of their online decision environment.

The guide as a tool

With the guidance, the ACM aims to protect consumers from being misled and encourage companies to act transparently. The document provides concrete tools to stay compliant and ensure trust in the digital market.

In brief, what the ACM advises:

  • Provide complete information;
  • Provide correct information;
  • Provide understandable information;
  • Provide the information before the consumer buys anything;
  • Make sure the information is easy to find;
  • Provide and logical and fair design;
  • Provide favourable default settings for consumers;
  • Take into account the vulnerability of consumers;

Read the summary of the guidance here and the full guidance here.

Recent insights

Design rights vs. trademark rights and copyright: how do you protect the design of your product?

Protecting a unique shape through trademark law is often challenging due to strict requirements regarding distinctive character. Design rights offer a more accessible alternative to secure your designs quickly and effectively. Read how design rights function as a supplement to copyright and discover the registration options within the EU and the Benelux.

Insight

Strict limits to trademark law: the Rubik’s Cube ruling

Can the shape of the Rubik’s Cube be a trademark? On July 9, 2025, the General Court of the EU ruled that technical features, such as the rotating blocks, cannot be protected as a trademark. Read why this ruling is crucial for the boundary between technology and trademark law.

Insight

Freeriders in trouble: just compensation for Dassault

The North Holland District Court awarded Dassault Systèmes damages based on lost licence revenue. Hooks Creative and Soopl used SolidWorks without a licence and thus infringed copyright.

Insight

Deel dit artikel

White sneakers with yellow pants on tiled floor

Would you like to make an appointment?

For an appointment with one of our lawyers, for advice or orientation, we would be happy to welcome you to our office in Ouderkerk aan de Amstel or we will come to you.

  • Top players in the market
  • Always high quality
  • Expert and discreet

No spam, ever.