Good Law successfully defends Tomorrowland

  • News

December 1, 2020

Picture Carja Mastenbroek

Carja Mastenbroek

Pen checking a marked checkbox illustration

Good Law assisted Tomorrowland in legal proceedings concerning advertising via email. The case concerned complaints about consent. The Board of Appeal ruled that consent had been freely and clearly given.

In November 2019, Good Law represented Tomorrowland in proceedings before the Advertising Code Committee and the Board of Appeal. The case revolved around emails sent on behalf of Tomorrowland and artist Lost Frequencies. The complainant challenged the validity of its consent and filed complaints about the content and contact information in the emails.

Advertising Code Committee ruling

The Commission found that when creating a Tomorrowland account, the complainant had explicitly ticked a checkbox agreeing to ‘other communication about Tomorrowland and related topics’. An information symbol clarified that these communications included messages from Lost Frequencies. The Commission ruled that this opt-in was sufficiently specific.

However, the Commission found in favour of the complainant on the complaint about the lack of contact details in the emails and made a recommendation to Tomorrowland to amend this in the future.

College: clear and free consent

On appeal, the complainant argued that the consent was insufficiently specific and that it could not make a sub-selection to exclude messages from Lost Frequencies. The Appeals Board rejected these arguments, ruling that:

  1. Ticking the checkbox constituted an active action granting consent.
  2. The explanation behind the question mark icon made it sufficiently clear that communications about Lost Frequencies were covered by the opt-in.
  3. The absence of a sub-choice did not prejudice the complainant’s free choice, as all subjects were closely related to Tomorrowland.
  4. The Board stressed that the information provided with the checkbox was clear and comprehensive. The use of an information symbol was seen as a good addition to provide consumers with additional clarity.

Conclusion

The complaint against Tomorrowland was declared largely unfounded by the Board, with the exception of the lack of contact information in the emails. Good Law successfully supported Tomorrowland in these proceedings, reaffirming the importance of clear and transparent consent for email advertising.

Recent insights

Freeriders in trouble: just compensation for Dassault

The North Holland District Court awarded Dassault Systèmes damages based on lost licence revenue. Hooks Creative and Soopl used SolidWorks without a licence and thus infringed copyright.

Insight

New: faster and more effective dispute resolution for shareholders

The Dispute Resolution and Clarification of Admissibility Requirements Survey Procedure Act (Wagevoe) makes it easier to settle shareholder disputes quickly and effectively.

News

Geoblocking and copyright: how far does the protection extend?

The Supreme Court asks the EU Court of Justice to clarify the legal status of geoblocking and VPNs in copyrighted works. What does this mean for online publications?

Insight

Deel dit artikel

White sneakers with yellow pants on tiled floor

Would you like to make an appointment?

For an appointment with one of our lawyers, for advice or orientation, we would be happy to welcome you to our office in Ouderkerk aan de Amstel or we will come to you.

  • Top players in the market
  • Always high quality
  • Expert and discreet

No spam, ever.